<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boil Before Drinking &#187; clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/tag/clinton/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com</link>
	<description>Watching...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Iowa Caucus: Surprises, Controversies.</title>
		<link>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2008/01/the-iowa-caucus-surprises-controversies.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2008/01/the-iowa-caucus-surprises-controversies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ninja Man: with Ninja Powers!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boilbeforedrinking.com/184/the-iowa-caucus-surprises-controversies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you&#8217;ve been living under a rock or have at least been avoidant of the American cable news channels, you know full well that the Iowa caucuses chimed in last night, beginning the process of selection for their party&#8217;s presidential candidates. The results (source): Democratic: Obama &#8211; 37.6%, Edwards &#8211; 29.7%, Clinton &#8211; 29.5%, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you&#8217;ve been living under a rock or have at least been <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0">avoidant</span> of the American cable news channels, you know full well that the Iowa caucuses chimed in last night, beginning the process of selection for their party&#8217;s presidential candidates. The results (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7170954.stm">source</a>):</p>
<p>Democratic: <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1">Obama</span> &#8211; 37.6%, Edwards &#8211; 29.7%, Clinton &#8211; 29.5%, Richardson &#8211; 2.1%.<br />Republican: <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2">Huckabee</span> &#8211; 34.3%, Romney &#8211; 25.3%, Thompson &#8211; 13.4%, McCain 13.1%, Paul &#8211; 10%, <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3">Guiliani</span> &#8211; 3.5%</p>
<p>First of all let me say I&#8217;m glad to see <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4">Assface</span> <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5">Guiliani</span> get trounced, but apparently he didn&#8217;t try very hard in this state anyway. Also, there&#8217;s a lot of controversy about the Iowa caucus in general and the importance placed upon it. See <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/03/6139/">this </a>editorial for some of these concerns.</p>
<p>Clearly, the biggest &#8220;surprise&#8221; of the evening was Hilary&#8217;s 3rd place showing. Michael Moore suggests a simple explanation &#8211; the two candidates that beat her oppose the war in Iraq, she doesn&#8217;t (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=221">link</a>).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/01/03/6142/">This </a>insight on the republican side is very interesting. Basically, the loose alliance between libertarian, evangelicals, big business, and the &#8216;empire builders&#8217; is falling apart and pulling right-wing voters in all directions.</p>
<p>What is most interesting to me is that <span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6">Huckabee</span> and in particular Edwards, who both had very strong and somewhat unexpected support, are hauntingly populist in their approach to the problems of corporate interference in politics &#8211; stances which have cost them the endorsement of nearly all major media outlets. My guess is that politically involved Americans have finally had it with &#8220;towing the party line&#8221;.</p>
<p>Finally, with Ron Paul only getting 10%, his supporters clearly have to get their butts away from the keyboard and get themselves involved in the process. In other words, &#8220;they need to put up or shut up&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2008/01/the-iowa-caucus-surprises-controversies.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hostage Taker Wants Drinking Buddies</title>
		<link>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2007/12/hostage-taker-wants-drinking-buddies.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2007/12/hostage-taker-wants-drinking-buddies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Runs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[booze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinking. hostage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boilbeforedrinking.com/146/hostage-taker-wants-drinking-buddies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across the following headline and thought it would be something funny: Clinton &#8216;hostage-taker&#8217; wanted help with drinking. Now how many other people would have assumed it was a story on some poor, lonely dude who couldn&#8217;t find someone to drink with him, and had to resort to taking booze hostages? I can&#8217;t be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across the following headline and thought it would be something funny: <span style="font-weight:bold;">Clinton &#8216;hostage-taker&#8217; wanted help with drinking</span>.  Now how many other people would have assumed it was a story on some poor, lonely dude who couldn&#8217;t find someone to drink with him, and had to resort to taking booze hostages?  I can&#8217;t be the only one.  Am I?</p>
<p>Alas, it turns out to be a tale of desperation and one man threatening to blow himself up for health care.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.mg.co.za/articlepage.aspx?area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__international_news/&#038;articleid=326700&#038;referrer=RSS'>Mail &#038; Guardian Online Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2007/12/hostage-taker-wants-drinking-buddies.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

