<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Boil Before Drinking &#187; bandwagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/tag/bandwagon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com</link>
	<description>Watching...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:46:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The second act of the end</title>
		<link>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2010/02/the-second-act-of-the-end.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2010/02/the-second-act-of-the-end.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brother Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2010/02/the-second-act-of-the-end.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Warming is dead, that&#8217;s been clear for a while now. However there&#8217;s still been a question about the long term viability of climate change. As more and more journalists decide it&#8217;s safe to start voicing serious questions about the validity of climate change claims, we&#8217;ll see more and more scientists withdrawing their associations with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global Warming is dead, that&#8217;s been clear for a while now. However there&#8217;s still been a question about the long term viability of climate change. As more and more journalists decide it&#8217;s safe to start voicing serious questions about the validity of climate change claims, we&#8217;ll see more and more scientists withdrawing their associations with &#8216;the climate change consensus&#8217;. Scientists are a much more timid group than journalists, so this will take a while, but isn&#8217;t going anywhere.&nbsp; <br /><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/the-great-global-warming-collapse/article1458206/">Until now, anyone who questioned the credibility of the IPCC was labelled as a climate skeptic, or worse. But many climate scientists now sense a sinking ship, and they&#8217;re bailing out.</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=525e1df6-4885-8fa7-ac7f-80de57da3aa5" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boilbeforedrinking.com/2010/02/the-second-act-of-the-end.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

